
The Schwartz Center’s
work is supported by strong scientific evidence. Schwartz Center
programs have been developed to address issues identified in the
health care literature and are evaluated to demonstrate efficacy.
Relevant research findings are highlighted below.
Context
The patient-caregiver relationship has become increasingly
stressed over the past few decades as a result of the changing
health care system.
Patients are more educated - with access to information
technology, direct-to-consumer advertising of medical products,
and “consumer directed” insurance products –
and expect to work closely with caregivers and be involved in
their medical care.
The U.S population has growing cultural and language
diversity and a myriad of insurance coverage challenges.
Health care providers are faced with productivity
expectations, time pressures, increased administrative burdens,
and transparent performance measures.
The Schwartz Center is
making a difference by:
- Improving Communication
- Promoting Compassion and Empathy
- Improving Cultural Competency
- Improving Spiritual Care
- Enhancing Compassionate End-of-Life Care
- Influencing Caregiver Training & Creating
Best Practice Models
- Empowering Patients
"By reinforcing the essential role of compassion
in health care, the Schwartz Center helps health care workers
keep in touch with their souls and stay connected to the humanitarian
motivations that drew them into this field."
- Peter Slavin, MD, President, Massachusetts General Hospital
Why Improving Communication Matters
In one study, at least half of the respondents reported
that their regular physician did not ask for their opinions about
treatment and care. Moreover, 30% of adults in poor health said
that their doctor did not motivate them to
adhere to treatment regimens. 1
Effective patient-caregiver communication is associated with:2,3,4.
5
- Stronger patient-caregiver relationships
- Enhanced patient satisfaction
- Superior decision making
- Increased compliance with recommended treatment6,
7, 8, 9
- Improved health outcomes 10
- Reduced malpractice claims 8
Patient-centered interviewing strategies can enhance
effectiveness of patient care processes and outcomes while retaining
efficiency of patient management. 14
Physicians who are more focused on the person than
on the illness, and who speak with patients about their options
freely, rated highest on 4 of 5 measures of quality and patient
satisfaction. 15
Strong doctor-patient relationships based
on trust and commitment are positively associated with patient
adherence to treatment.16
- Cancer screening rates improve when healthcare
providers spend more time with patients and adequately explain
the importance of surveillance.17
- Mammography adherence in Latina women has been
linked to satisfaction with the health-care relationship.18
- In a sample of low-income African-American patients,
adherence to antihypertensive medications was higher among patients
who rated their provider’s communication style as more
collaborative.8
Chronically ill women who reported a connected relationship
with a health care provider and viewed their care as a partnership
had more confidence and motivation to manage their illness and
a greater sense of well-being. 20
Communication between cancer patients and
their care providers may impact cancer outcomes by influencing
empowerment and hope. Physician communication has been reported
to generate hope even when poor prognoses are disclosed. 23
Patient-centered communication, an approach to care
that helps patients feel understood at a psychosocial level and
expands patient involvement in health decisions, is associated
with a decrease in diagnostic test expenditures. When doctors
listen to their patients, fewer tests are needed to come to the
appropriate medical conclusions. 25
Physicians who spend more time with patients,
educate patients about what to expect, use humor, solicit patients’
opinions, and check understanding have fewer malpractice claims.5
Schwartz Center Initiatives: (click
on links for detailed program information)
- Schwartz
Center Rounds
- Speaker
Series
- The
Patient Voice for Compassionate Care: Schwartz Center Dialogues
Why Compassion
and Empathy Matter
“When patients talk about the quality of health care, [they]
mean something entirely different than experts do . . . compassion.”
When caregivers demonstrate compassion and empathy, their patients
feel a stronger connection to their providers and feel more engaged
in the health care process. 26
Empathy:
- Makes patients more forthcoming about their symptoms
and concerns, yielding more accurate diagnoses and better care
- Helps patients regain autonomy and participate
in their therapy
- Leads to therapeutic interactions that directly
affect patient recovery.27
Practitioners with warm, friendly, reassuring relationships
with their patients were found to be more effective than practitioners
who kept consultations formal and did not offer reassurance.7,
28
Patients are less likely to file a malpractice claim
if they feel their physician was caring and compassionate, even
when there is a bad outcome.5
Interviews with oncology patients revealed that
the degree to which they had felt ‘known’ by their
health care provider, understood as a human distinct from the
diseased organ, was a powerful force, often shaping their entire
cancer care experience. 29
Nurses demonstrating more empathy felt more committed
to their jobs and were less likely to experience emotional burnout.
30
Opportunities to reflect and process feelings triggered
by their work refuels hospice clinicians and reduces the risk
of staff burnout.31
Sharing stories about deceased patients with peers
increased support, added meaning to the work, and was viewed as
a positive approach to coping with grief by pediatric oncology
nurses. 32
Of caregivers who participate in Schwartz
Center Rounds, 84% report feeling more compassion for patients
and families and more energized about relationships with patients.33
Schwartz Center
Initiatives: (click on links for detailed program information)
- Compassionate
Caregiver Award
- Schwartz
Center Rounds
- CarePages
Compassionate Connections
Why Spiritual Care Matters
Only 11% of respondents using prayer
discussed it with their physicians.34
Among adult hospital inpatients interviewed, 77%
believed that a physician should consider their spiritual needs35
and 72% of Americans say that they would welcome a conversation
with their physician about faith. 36
Patients with unmet spiritual needs report less
satisfaction and poorer quality of care. 37
Patients’ desire for physician involvement
with their spiritual and religious concerns increased as the severity
of illness increased. 38
The extent to which terminal patients rely on religious
coping correlates with advance care planning and desire for aggressive
end-of-life treatment. 39
Patients who viewed their disease as an indication
that God was punishing or abandoning them were 30% more likely
to die over the next two years.15
By connecting spiritually, caregivers are
better able to relate to a patient’s deepest fears, accurately
design treatment and help patients experience a more meaningful
and hopeful existence or a more dignified and peaceful death.
42
Schwartz Center Initiatives: (click
on links for detailed program information)
- Clinical Pastoral
Education Fellowships for Health Care Professionals
- Schwartz
Center Rounds
- Grants
Why Enhancing Candor and Compassion
in End-of-Life Care Matters
Most physicians are reluctant to initiate straightforward end-of-life
discussions with their patients. 43
Discussing end-of-life care can improve patients’
quality of life.37 Dying patients who participated in an intervention
that promoted discussion of end-of-life issues showed improvements
in functional status, anxiety, depression, and sense of preparation.
44
End-of-life discussions are associated with less
aggressive medical care near death and earlier hospice referrals,
contributing to improved quality of life for patients and better
bereavement adjustments for family caregivers. 45
Conversations about end-of-life care could lower
national healthcare expenditures by tens of millions dollars each
year for cancer care alone.37
Physicians who viewed end-of-life care as an important
responsibility reported increased job satisfaction. 46
Health care institutions participating in Schwartz
Center Rounds report earlier connections to palliative care services
and significant improvements in end of life care for patients
and families.14
Schwartz Center Initiatives: (click
on links for detailed program information)
- Clinical
Pastoral Education Fellowships for Health Care Professionals
- Schwartz
Center Rounds
- Grants
W hy Cultural Competency
Matters
Studies repeatedly show that patients
desire health care that is culturally competent while providers
receive little or no training in this area and present little
diversity for patients to choose from. 49
Fundamental differences among people arising from
nationality, ethnicity, and culture affect:
- Perceptions about diseases and their causes
- Help-seeking behaviors
- Attitudes toward health care providers
- Expectations of health care encounters
- Provider, patient and family behaviors19,
50
Ethnic differences between caregivers and patients
pose barriers to partnership and effective communication. Physicians
may incorporate biases into their interpretation of symptoms and
medical decision making. Caregivers need to be educated as to
how to communicate appropriately with all types of patients.51
Culturally competent health care involves
awareness of and respect for cultural differences and results
in improved communication, better health outcomes, and greater
patient satisfaction.52
Schwartz Center Initiatives:
(click on links for detailed program information)
- Speaker
Series
- Grants
Why Influencing Caregiver Training
Matters
Caregivers often receive little training in the non-clinical
aspects of patient care and are therefore reluctant to deal with
patients on a more personal level. One survey indicated that while
83.8% of general practitioners felt communication skills were
as important as technical skills to achieve positive patient outcomes,
more than a third rated their communication training as inadequate.53
Effective communication skills can be taught.56
To strengthen the level of compassionate care, training
must begin in graduate school, continue throughout residency/practical
training, and be integrated into all levels of professional continuing
education.57 The health system
must reward and reinforce compassionate care giving and provide
positive role models from which others can learn.24
A group faculty development approach that included
exploration of values and supportive self-reflection had a “positive
impact on participants' humanistic teaching.” 58
Training doctors to manage their emotional responses
openly may improve clinical judgment and reduce work stress.59
Research suggests decreasing stress may enhance communication
in the patient-provider relationship. 60
Physicians who are stressed and dissatisfied are
more likely to report making errors and/or providing suboptimal
patient care.61
When medical errors occur, patients want caregivers
to acknowledge the incident, take responsibility and apologize.
Many providers are unprepared to deal with medical errors and
lack the skill to apologize. 6, 62
Schwartz Center Rounds participants report
a significant reduction in stress and emotional difficulties.
One survey revealed 88% of Rounds participants became more open
to expressing thoughts about patient care with colleagues and
88% developed a greater sense of belonging to a caregiving team.14
Schwartz Center Initiatives:
- Schwartz
Center Rounds
- Grants
- The
Patient Voice for Compassionate Care: Schwartz Center Dialogues
Why Empowering Patients Matters
Care that is truly patient-centered embraces the patient
as an integral partner who collaborates in making clinical decisions,
giving the patient responsibility for self-care and monitoring
along with the tools and support to carry out that responsibility.64
When patients participate in shared-decision making
with their caregivers, they are more likely to comply with recommended
treatment.65 Health outcomes
improve, costs decrease and patient satisfaction increases.4,
66
Patients with HIV who shared decision making with
their providers were more likely to adhere to treatment guidelines.67
Consumers will choose services that make them
feel better and live longer, go to providers who teach them how
to be better patients and select health plans that encourage healthy
lifestyles.68
Schwartz Center Initiatives:
(click on links for detailed program information)
- The
Patient Voice for Compassionate Care: Schwartz Center Dialogues
- CarePages
Compassionate Connections
References:
1. Blendon R, Schoen C, DesRoches C, Osborn R, Zapert K. Common
concerns amid diverse systems: Health care experiences in five
countries. Health Affairs. 2003; 22(3):106-121.
2. Makoul G, Curry RH. The value of assessing and
addressing communication skills. JAMA. 2007;298:1057-1059.
3. Stewart M., Brown J, Donner A, McWhinney I, et
al.. The Impact of Patient-Centered Care on Outcomes. Journal
of Family Practice. 2000;49:796-804.
4. Stewart M, Brown JB, Boon H, Galajda J, Meredith
L, Sangster M. Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer
Prev Control. 1999;3(1):25-30.
5. Stewart M. Effective physician-patient communications
and health outcomes: A review. Canadian Medical Association Journal.
1995;152:1423-1433.
6. Berry L, Parish J, Janakiraman R, et al. Patients’
commitment to their primary care physicians and why it matters.
Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(1):6-13.
7. Piette J, Heisler M, Krein S, Kerr E. The role
of patient-physician trust in moderating medication nonadherence
due to cost pressures. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(15):1749-55.
8. Schneider J, Kaplan S, Greenfield S, et al. Better
physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported
adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(11):1096-103.
9. Schoenthaler A, Chaplin WF, Allegrante JP, Fernandez
S, Diaz-Gloster M, Tobin JN, Ogedegbe G. Provider communication
effects medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov 13. [Epub ahead of print]
10. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, et al. Influence
of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet.
2001;357(9258):757-62.
11. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT,
Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication: The relationship
with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). 1997;277(7):553-559.
12. Lein C, Wills C. Using patient-centered interviewing
skills to manage complex patient encounters in primary care. J
Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 May;19(5):215-20.
13. Flocke SA, Miller WL, Crabtree BJ. Relationships
between physician practice style, patient satisfaction, and attributes
of primary care. Journal of Family Practice. 2002;51:835-840.
14. Berry L, Parish J, Janakiraman R, et. al. Patients’
commitment to their primary physician and why it matters. Ann
Fam Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;6(1):6-13.
15. Carcaise-Edinboro P, Bradley CJ. Influence of
patient-provider communication on colorectal cancer screening.
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):738-45.
16. Sheppard VB, Wang J, Yi B, Harrison TM, Feng
S, Huerta EE, Mandelblatt JS; Latin American Cancer Research Coalition.
Are health-care relationships important for mammography adherence
in Latinas? J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):2024-30.
17. Fox S, Chesla C. Living with chronic illness:
a phenomenological study of the health effects of the patient-provider
relationship. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Mar;20(3):109-17.
18. Thorne S, Hislop T, Armstrong E, Oglov V. Cancer
care communication: the power to harm and the power to heal? Patient
Educ Couns. 2008 Apr;71(1):34-40.
19. Mack J, Wolfe J, Cook E, et.al. Hope and prognostic
disclosure. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec;25(35):5636-42.
20. Epstein RM, Franks P, Shields CG, Meldrum SC,
Miller KN, Campbell TL, Fiscella K. Patient-centered communication
and diagnostic testing. Annals of Family Medicine. 2005;3:415-421.
21. Sanghavi DM. Beyond the white coat and the johnny: What makes
for a compassionate patient-caregiver relationship? Findings from
a national conversation sponsored by the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center.
Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2006;32(5):283-292.
22. Halpern J. From detached concern to empathy:
Humanizing medical practice. Oxford University Press;2001.
23. van Weel C. Examination of context of medicine. The Lancet.
2001;357(9258):733-734.
24. Thorne SE, Kuo M, Armstrong EA, McPherson G,
Harris SR, Hislop TG. Being known: Patients’ perspectives
of the dynamics of human connection in cancer care. Psycho-Oncology.
2005;14: 887-898.
25. Raiziene S, Endriulaitiene A. The relations
among empathy, occupational commitment, and emotional exhaustion
of nurses. Medicina. 2007;43(5):425-31.
26. Running A, Girard D, Woodward Tolle L. When
there is nothing left to do, there is everything left to do. Am
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007 Dec-2008 Jan;24(6):451-4.
27. Macpherson CF. Peer-supported storytelling for
grieving pediatric oncology nurses. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2008
May-Jun;25(3):148-63. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
28. Goodman Research Group Inc. Schwartz Center
Rounds commissioned evaluation report. 2007.
29. McCaffrey A, Eisenberg D, Legedza A, et al..
Prayer for health concerns: Results from a national survey on
prevalence and patterns of use. Arch Int Med. 2004;164:858-862.
30. Astrow A, Sulmasy D. Spirituality and the patient-physician
relationship. JAMA. 2004;291:2884.
31. Kalb C. Faith & Healing. Newsweek. 2003
Nov 10:44-56.
32. Astrow A, Wexler A, Texeira K, et. al. Is failure
to meet spiritual needs associated with cancer patients’
perceptions of quality of care and their satisfaction with care?
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec;25(36):5753-7.
33. MacLean C, Susi B, Phifer N, et al. Patient
preferences for physician discussion and practice of spirituality.
J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 38–43.
34. Andrea C. Phelps, MD; Paul K. Maciejewski, PhD;
Matthew Nilsson, et.al. Religious coping and use of intensive
life-prolonging care near death in patients with advanced cancer.
JAMA. 2009;301(11):1140-1147.
35. Fisch MJ, Titzer ML, Kristeller JL, Shen J,
Loehrer PJ, Jung SH, Passick SD, Einhorn, LH, Hoosier Oncology
Group. Assessment of quality of life in outpatients with advanced
cancer: The accuracy of clinician estimations and the relevance
of spiritual well-being. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21(14):2754-2759.
36. Zhang B, Wright AA, Huskamp HA, et. al. Health
care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life
conversations. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Mar 9;169(5):480-8.
37. Steinhauser KE, Alexander SC, Byock IR, George
LK, Olsen MK, Tulsky JA. Do preparation and life completion discussions
improve functioning and quality of life in seriously ill patients?
Pilot randomized control trial. J Palliat Med. 2008 Nov;11(9):1234-40.
38. Wright A, Zhang B, Ray A, et. al. JAMA. Association
between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical
care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. 2008;300(14):1665-1673.
39. Jackson VA, Mack J, Matsuyama R, Lakoma MD,
Sullivan AM, Arnold RM, Weeks JC, Block SD. A qualitative study
of oncologists' approaches to end-of-life care. J Palliat Med.
2008 Jul;11(6):893-906.
40. Goode T, Dunn M, Bronheim S. The evidence base
for cultural and linguistic competency in health care. The Commonwealth
Fund. 2006. Available from: http://www.cmwf.org/usr_doc/Goode_evidencebasecultlinguisticcomp_962.pdf
41. Puebla Fortier J, ed. The impact of culture
on health care delivery. 2003. Available from: http://www.diversityrx.org/HTML/ESLANG.htm
42. Cooper P, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, Vu HT, Powe
NR, Nelson C, Ford DE. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician
relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282:583-589.
43. Health Resources Services Administration, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. Cultural Competency Works.
2001. Available from: ftp://ftp.hrsa.gov/financeMC/cultural-competence.pdf
44. Ashbury F, Iverson D, Kralj B. Physician communication
skills: Results of a survey of general/family practitioners in
Newfoundland. Medical Education Online. 2001;6(1). Available from:
http://cogprints.org/2420/
45. Rider E, Lown B, Hinrichs M. Teaching communication
skills. Medical Education. 2004;38(5):558-9.
46. Rider E, Hinrichs M, Lown B. A model for communication
skills assessment across the undergraduate curriculum. Med Teach.
2006;28(5):e127-34.
47. Branch WT Jr, Frankel R, Gracey C, et. al. A
good clinician and a caring person: longitudinal faculty development
and the enhancement of the human dimensions of care. Acad Med.
2009 Jan;84(1):117-25.
48. Yedidia M. Transforming doctor-patient relationships
to promote patient centered care: Lessons from palliative care.
Journal of Pain Symptom Management. 2007;33:40-
49. Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, et. al.
Determinants and patient-
reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology:
a structural equation modeling approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2007
Dec;69(1-3):63-75.
50. Williams E, Manwell L, Konrad T, Linzer M. The
relationship of organizational culture, stress, satisfaction,
and burnout with physician-reported error and suboptimal patient
care: results from the MEMO study. Health Care Manage Rev. 2007;32(3):203-12.
51. Leape L. Understanding the power of apology:
How saying ‘I’m sorry’ helps heal patients and
caregivers. National Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter. 2005;
8(4):1-3.
52. Rutherford P, Lee B, Greiner A. Transforming
Care at the Bedside. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Boston:
Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2004. Available from: www.IHI.org
53. Christen R, Alder J, Bitzer J. Gender differences
in physicians’ communicative skills and their influence
on patient satisfaction in gynaecological outpatient consultations.
Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(7):1474-83.
54. Sidani S. Effects of patient-centered care on
patient outcomes: an evaluation. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22(1):24-37.
55. Beach M, Duggan P, Moore R. Is patients' preferred
involvement in health decisions related to outcomes for patients
with HIV? J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Aug;22(8):1119-24.
56. Wilson-Steele G. Transforming health care
through patient empowerment. Health Management Technology. 2006;27(4):42-44.
|